An alert reader pointed out that some of the predictions I made earlier were total nonsense. The first group, where I pick series winners and probabilities of winning, I stand by, but the second group, where I place odds on winning it all, those are not so good.
So I redid them, and actually tried this time, instead of being lazy, and here is what I came up with:
| team | p(title) |
| bos | 0.272126 |
| det | 0.116574 |
| lal | 0.091853 |
| san | 0.082671 |
| nor | 0.078856 |
| hou | 0.071202 |
| pho | 0.062373 |
| orl | 0.054235 |
| uta | 0.046801 |
| dal | 0.03739 |
| den | 0.030089 |
| cle | 0.018941 |
| was | 0.013058 |
| tor | 0.010618 |
| phi | 0.009039 |
| atl | 0.004175 |
These make a little bit more sense… the Western Conference teams hurt each others’ odds a little bit, and we’re left with Detroit and Boston taking advantage of a somewhat easier time of it in the east. The spreadsheet I used can be seen here. Apologies for doing such a shoddy job the first time around. I’m sticking with these as my official word, and I still don’t give Utah much of a chance.
1 response so far ↓
Anything’s possible. « The Arbitrarian // June 18, 2008 at 8:16 am
[...] like to point out, that despite seemingly everyone picking the Lakers to win this series, I had the Celtics winning the championship (not that this was a particularly bold [...]
Leave a Comment