Last night’s game was awesome–I admit a pro-Celtics bias on account of a pro-Kevin Garnett bias, but also and anti-Kobe Bryant bias. When claiming objectivity, it’s always a good thing to clear potential biases up front, to let the reader know who they’re dealing with… That said, Garnett had a pretty good game last night, and Bryant had a pretty bad game… Garnett would have been even better without that cold streak–the only player who missed more shots was Kobe, who missed 17! Using the results of a huge, awesome linear regression the results of which have not yet been made public (although it’s very similar to the coefficients seen here), I derive the following from last nights box scores:
| Player | min | pts | MEV | PVC | PtC | Credit |
| Kevin Garnett | 40.65 | 24 | 22.33 | 0.250 | 25.94 | 0.279 |
| Paul Pierce | 31.07 | 22 | 18.49 | 0.207 | 21.48 | 0.231 |
| Pau Gasol | 41.47 | 15 | 19.39 | 0.246 | 20.52 | 0.221 |
| Derek Fisher | 40.82 | 15 | 18.98 | 0.241 | 20.09 | 0.216 |
| Ray Allen | 43.95 | 19 | 16.85 | 0.189 | 19.57 | 0.210 |
| Rajon Rondo | 35.03 | 15 | 14.92 | 0.167 | 17.34 | 0.186 |
| Lamar Odom | 39.02 | 14 | 12.90 | 0.163 | 13.65 | 0.147 |
| Kobe Bryant | 41.87 | 24 | 11.06 | 0.140 | 11.71 | 0.126 |
| Vladimir Radmanovic | 17.05 | 5 | 9.86 | 0.125 | 10.43 | 0.112 |
| Leon Powe | 9.32 | 4 | 6.85 | 0.077 | 7.96 | 0.086 |
| Sam Cassell | 12.97 | 8 | 5.40 | 0.061 | 6.28 | 0.067 |
| P.J. Brown | 21.20 | 2 | 5.08 | 0.057 | 5.90 | 0.063 |
| Sasha Vujacic | 26.52 | 8 | 4.17 | 0.053 | 4.41 | 0.047 |
| Ronny Turiaf | 12.38 | 5 | 1.74 | 0.022 | 1.84 | 0.020 |
| Jordan Farmar | 7.18 | 2 | 0.86 | 0.011 | 0.91 | 0.010 |
| Kendrick Perkins | 23.02 | 1 | 0.63 | 0.007 | 0.73 | 0.008 |
| Luke Walton | 13.70 | 0 | -0.05 | -0.001 | -0.06 | -0.001 |
| James Posey | 22.80 | 3 | -1.39 | -0.016 | -1.61 | -0.017 |
| Totals | 480 | 186 | 168.05 | 2.000 | 187.08 | 2.012 |
MEV is the term for model-estimated value or point difference created, using only the regression weights. PVC is percent of valuable contributions, which is each player’s part of total team MEV. PtC is points created, which scales MEV values according to actual team and opponent scoring, to roughly account for those factors unmeasured by the box score, and Credit is, essentially, the amount of a win each player should be credited for. MEV and PtC are intended to account for both offensive and defensive contributions, that is, the player’s contribution to his own team’s scoring, and his defense preventing his opponent’s scoring. Boston’s total team Credit was 1.114, and LA’s was 0.898, based on the number of points each scored. It appears as though Boston was able to do to Kobe what they did in the regular season. Note that Posey, despite a timely three, actually hurt his team some: his two turnovers and three personal fouls effectively cancelled out his two steals, while his two defensive rebounds and three points could not compensate sufficiently for four missed shots. However, this is only based on box scores… he may have had tremendous unmeasured defense which I cannot capture, since his plus/minus was +3. It’s interesting to compare my metrics with plus/minus figures: Kobe was -13 for the game…
3 responses so far ↓
Carrying the burden « The Arbitrarian // June 6, 2008 at 9:48 pm |
[...] ← The Road to the NBA Finals Credit where credit is due [...]
Serhat // June 7, 2008 at 10:37 am |
I doubt majority of people or media will easily understand those sort of stats. PPG, MPG.. era has yet to come to an end.
Credits to your effort! Thanks…
Who won the game for Boston? « The Arbitrarian // June 9, 2008 at 6:23 am |
[...] Other output ← Credit where credit is due [...]